Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add: extension store issues are out-of-scope #247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2022
Merged

add: extension store issues are out-of-scope #247

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2022

Conversation

hanguokai
Copy link
Member

As #240 , extension store issues are out-of-scope.

@hanguokai
add: extension store issues are out-of-scope
51cae22 
As w3c#240 , extension store issues are out-of-scope.
@hanguokai hanguokai mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2022
Closed
@w3cbot
Copy link

w3cbot commented Jul 24, 2022

hanguokai marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

dotproto
dotproto approved these changes Jul 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dotproto dotproto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This clarification seems like it may help better set expectations.

@dotproto
Copy link
Member

Since this is a minor a modification to our charter, I want to quickly highlight the relevant line from the Amendments to this Charter section of the charter.

The group may make simple corrections to the charter such as deliverable dates by the simpler group decision process rather than this charter amendment process.

To that end, I'd like to get LGTMs from the group's editors and chairs before landing this change.

zombie
zombie approved these changes Aug 18, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@zombie zombie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, this was our understanding from the beginning, good to be explicit.

@Rob--W Rob--W mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2022
Merged
@dotproto
Copy link
Member

While we don't have explicit approval from @mukul-p, he did not raise any concerns with this when we discussed it the 2022-08-18 meeting. For the sake of this PR I'm interpreting that as tacit approval.

@dotproto dotproto merged commit c27bdfa into w3c:main Aug 31, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2022
@dotproto @github-actions
Merge pull request #247 from hanguokai/patch-1
c5a6674 
SHA: c27bdfa
Reason: push, by @dotproto

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@hanguokai hanguokai deleted the patch-1 branch September 1, 2022 02:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dotproto dotproto dotproto approved these changes

@zombie zombie zombie approved these changes

@xeenon xeenon xeenon approved these changes

@mukul-p mukul-p Awaiting requested review from mukul-p

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@hanguokai @w3cbot @dotproto @xeenon @zombie